Energy Efficiency with eHeat

Author: Jeff Wheeler, Vice President of Operations


Electric heaters are a highly efficient way to add heat to an application. Resistance heating has a very high efficiency as nearly 100% of the electricity applied is converted to heat energy, by far the most efficient of all the methods of producing heat. They also offer a very high watt density versus the available space and can maintain very high temperatures which fits a wide variety of in tool heating needs.

But its that versatility that also limits the opportunities to optimize the design to better fit the needs of the changing world.

What the design is today

Traditional cartridge heaters use a high temperature resistant material for the sheath of the heater.  These materials can operate up to 800C (1472F) and must be oxidation resistant at this high of operating temperature.  However, not every application runs at that high of temperature.  And the trade off for designing for a high temperature affects the installed performance as a system, where the heater must transfer the heat to the tool.

How heat works in a system

This is long, but it’s important to understand.  Take for example a Form Fill and Seal packaging lines operate at temperatures below 650F.  A traditional cartridge heater for this application would use a stainless-steel case material, rated to 1472F.

Stainless steel is excellent at corrosion and oxidation protection because it uses Chromium which forms a Chromium Oxide layer on the surface and protects the metal.  However as a heat transfer medium Chromium sucks, with a typical thermal conductivity of 16.1W/m.K @ 100C – much lower than many of the alloys.  Even the 4140 alloy which is used in many tools is measured at 42.6W/m.K.

Why does that matter you ask?  Well to answer this we must think of the heater as part of the system – where the tool is absorbing the heat energy, the sensor is measuring the temperature and the tool is dissipating heat into an end process as a load.

  • The heater internally converts the current flow to heat energy, which transfers the heat to the sheath of the heater via conduction through the insulation material
  • Since the heater is inserted into a tool (normally as a slip fit) the heat transfers from the sheath of the heater to the inside of the tool bore at point of contact via conduction, and across the air gap via convection.
  • The heat is absorbed by the tool and dissipates within the mass via conduction to the sensor as well as the point of heat loss (load).

Each of these stages takes time for the heat to move through.  Conduction is by far the fastest transfer method, convection and radiation are slower.  And since the system is under closed loop control by the temperature controller, the sensor needs to report back quickly to manage the power signal being sent to the heater to maintain the best balance of heat input vs loss.

So back to the thermal conductivity.  The part with the lowest thermal conductivity in the above system is the heater sheath.  This means that this acts as a damper to the rate of heat energy transfer from the core of the heater to the tool itself.  And in a process control system that is PID based this is inefficiency.

PID Control Power Curve  Graph
Figure 1 – Typical PID control power curve to heater

Heaters are designed to produce a specific maximum wattage (i.e. 500W) at a constant power input.  In use however the amount of power consumed in the application will be lower depending on the amount of time the power is on – or for those that had the misfortune of experiencing Integral calculus it is referred to the “area under the curve”.  That is the electricity you really pay for.

Speeding up the rate of thermal transfer in the system will reduce the time that it takes for heat energy to be reacted to, thus reducing the amount of time the power is being consumed.  The below graph shows two systems as a comparison.

eHeat vs Conventional Comparison Graph
Figure 2 – eHeat vs Conventional comparison

This is actual data from a Form Fill and Seal packaging system comparing two cartridge heaters. 

  • The blue represents the standard heater construction
  • The red represents the unique eHeat design

As you can see the number of pulses of power needed to maintain set point is higher in the blue system than the red system, as well as the actual consumption of power (represented by the area under the line) is higher than the red.

By the numbers:

  • Blue power measured at 7.91Wh, with a peak Wattage recorded of 475.9W
  • Red power measured at 5.91Wh, with a peak Wattage recorded of 420W

This represents a 25% energy reduction during system operation as well as a lower peak wattage needed to maintain set value.

As they say – the proof is in the pudding.  So, we built a test system with two identical packaging jaws, with identical wattage heaters being monitored by power meters and controlled to a set temperature.  The following picture shows the set up:

eHeat Display
Figure 3 – eHeat Display

The top heater is the eHeat construction, the bottom is the conventional heater.  Each jaw is offset from each other, and the fan draws heat out so it’s not being influenced from the other jaw.  Energy usage is shown on the left, set temperature is on the right.  In the time this display was running, it recorded a 23% lower energy use in the eHeat construction.  This display is set up to run at any of our trade shows, stop by to see it and ask questions.

What it means to the customer

There are several advantages that this technology can allow.

Energy savings

In this new focus on saving energy and supporting green options many companies are looking at high efficiency improvements to lower operating costs.  Since the second highest energy consumer on a packaging line is the electric heaters, a 25% reduction can be significant.

More Options for limited installations

It could also mean that the savings allows for more system capacity if the control system is limited in available amps in general.

Reduced scrap

As many customers, especially in liquid packaging, will understand that the startup of the packaging process can contribute to significant scrap.  From the point of starting the line there is a tendency for the sealing jaw to lose heat until the system can relearn from the control loops and adjust.  In testing of this heater in a liquid packaging machine it was noted that the temperature drop on startup was 1°F, where a typical drop can be 4-6°F on a standard heater, making those first packages mis-form the seal resulting in leakers. 

Higher control system reliability

With switching a lower load less often, the SSR relay could be more reliable over the life of the control system.  Heat buildup inside the SSR from turning the current on and off causes failure and with lower current being switched and longer cooling cycles allowed the core temperature of the SSR will be lower.

What is the tradeoff? 

The tradeoff is that the service temperature of this alloy is limited to 650F.

If your application is below that maximum temperature, you can take benefit of all the advantages of this new development – lower energy consumption, faster thermal response, and improved operating conditions for the control system.  This technology is designed to be a drop in replacement to a standard cartridge heater and is offered in selected diameters with familiar options to the standard heater designs.

Share this article on social media:

Contact a Nexthermal Representative

Interested to learn more?  Our knowledgeable sales team is ready to connect with you to discuss any questions you may have and help you find the right products and/or services that fit your needs.

Scroll to Top
Now Through All of June

50% Off

Expedite Fees


If you are trying to access the legacy configurator, please click here instead.